_k1ngarthur

Also check out the performance advisor https://supabase.com/dashboard/project/_/advisors/performance

I would also double check the math on performance/cost. This article is from quite a while back but it does highlight that supabase my not necessarily be more expensive than pinecone at scale https://supabase.com/blog/pgvector-vs-pinecone if cost is your main driver.

There is also this guide on performance tuning https://supabase.com/docs/guides/platform/performance#examining-query-performance which might be helpful.

I did a bit of research and all i could find was that using COPY instead of INSERT was suggested for bulk inserts. Is that what you are currentlu doing for that?

Ahh okay, i've raised it with them.

Is the amount you would need to pay tomorrow > $800

Ahh okay, i will see if i can escalate this to a shared contributor chanel with the supabase team (note i am not an employee) but its the first i have seen so i can't promise much

Okay that makes more sense, and you already paid this amount upfront?

Could you explain who this contract was signed with? Is this an enterprise supabase account?

Which documents are this? Sorry i'm confused about what exactly support said and who is "they make it $3500" referring to?

do you want to top up your account more or are you asking if the credits are applied automatically?

Branches are essentially treated like new projects which i do agree isn't ideal but that does mean they can skew from your main project since they always have the most up to date setup

In terms of orchestration i will leave it to others to help with that. But this guide might help https://supabase.com/docs/guides/functions/ai-models

I think this is a question only support can handle, as it does seems like an issue with the instance (especially if restarting did not help)

Nothing in the UI though perhaps a good feature request! I would suggest using an online JSON splitter such as https://jsonviewertool.com/json-split to split but i am not sure that ends up being that much faster than downloading a row of csv files

No worries!

which should match what you are looking for

they have 5 minute OTP (not changable apparently) and configurable email invite time

I had a brief look at some of them, i couldn't find any that do both but you might want to check out auth0

You can check out the third party auth systems here https://supabase.com/docs/guides/auth/third-party/overview

On top of that there is a point raised here https://supabase.com/docs/reference/javascript/auth-onauthstatechange that using async calls in the OnAuthStateChange event handler can cause some issues so i would also check there (or share your code if you want someone else to check for you)

I think the way to guarantee is single client instance is to avoid creating you supabase client multiple times. You should be instantating it once and then exporting that to other files to use again instead of calling `CreateClient` multiple times.

If that is not the issue could you share any log/error trace of what the error is when you try and use your client

What is the url you are using, are you using the one inside of your project dashboard home located here or the one in the url box

I don't think is possible yet judging by this https://github.com/orgs/supabase/discussions/23444

There is a risk of getting the project stuck occasionally but it seems that you are currently unable to use the database anyway

Is this somethin that could be fixed by a project restart (not pause)?

Here are two links by the way which might also help https://supabase.com/docs/guides/deployment/branching/configuration and https://supabase.com/blog/cli-v2-config-as-code

For example in your `config.toml`do you have ```# Number of characters used in the email OTP. otp_length = 6``` 8/6 here?

So is your config.toml setup locally with all of these things and is this for branches or your main project?

Where is the other graph for current billing period usage for IOPSs i can only see the one in observability section?

no it doesn't look like the region changes for that feature

you have to compare what is in the header with what is in the environment variables

here is come example code of how that might work https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/examples/edge-functions/supabase/functions/_shared/jwt/default.ts

click into the edge functions -> settings, however the main thing is to add authorization checks inside of your edge function and deploy a new version otherwise you leave your edge functions exposed

this post explains it a bit more https://github.com/orgs/supabase/discussions/29260#discussion-7173511

if so you have to apply `--no-verify-jwt` in edge functions when using the new api keys

for an edge function right?

wait how did you replace it, is this inside of and edge function?

So what have you done so far in terms of migration so far?

so you will need to create a new project in that region first

This is the only way it mentions to do that https://supabase.com/docs/guides/troubleshooting/change-project-region-eWJo5Z

This is all that i could find on this^

``` You should be able to do this by just creating a new Supabase account using email/password, then inviting this new account to your Org as an Owner. ```

ive raised it in a seperate channel, i will let you know if they come back with anything

I can't speak for all the question but `/admn` route seems like the way to go, keeps you nimble and also if you need an admin app later that shouldn't be too much work to set up.

i'm not sure but i would assume you fill in the email to get it?

I do remember having this issue a while back and i think it's a state issue on supabase where if you use a different device/vpn/browser it might work. I remember though that i just started using signup with github instead

Ahh that is annoying, i suggest filing a support ticket then. This may be a question for infra to solve

you could try running the commands here https://github.com/supabase/stripe-sync-engine/pull/262/changes, i don't see why they wouldn't work since it has `IF EXISTS` on the constrainst so the next time you can run the migration it wouldn't fall over if those constraints do not exist